AK · rules
Alaska R. Evid. 608
Evidence of Character and Conduct of Witness
(a) Opinion and Reputation Evidence of Character.
The credibility of a witness may be attacked or supported by
evidence in the form of opinion or reputation, but subject to
these limitations: (1) the evidence may refer only to character
for truthfulness or untruthfulness; and (2) evidence of truthful
character is admissible only after the character of the witness
for truthfulness has been attacked by opinion or reputation
evidence or otherwise.
(b) Specific Instances of Conduct. If a witness testifies
concerning the character for truthfulness or untruthfulness of a
previous witness, the specific instances of conduct probative of
the truthfulness or untruthfulness of the previous witness, may
be inquired into on cross-examination. Evidence of other
specific instances of the conduct of a witness offered for the
purpose of attacking or supporting that witness’ credibility is
inadmissible unless such evidence is explicitly made
admissible by these rules, by other rules promulgated by the
Alaska Supreme Court or by enactment of the Alaska
Legislature.
(c) Admissibility. Before a witness may be impeached
by inquiry into specific instances of conduct pursuant to
subdivision (b), the court shall be advised of the specific
instances of conduct upon which inquiry is sought and shall
rule if the witness may be impeached by such inquiry by
weighing its probative value against its prejudicial effect.
History
(Added by SCO 364 effective August 1, 1979)
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c6c8a21a293e7e5fa7c4f206e2728da18bf96df4810e361a2177b155ace0bb59
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.