Bindinglaw

AK · rules

Alaska R. Crim. P. 8

Joinder of Offenses and of Defendants

activein force · 1992-07-15 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Joinder of Offenses. Two or more offenses may be

charged in the same indictment or information in a separate

count for each offense if the offenses charged, whether

felonies, misdemeanors or both,

(1) are of the same or similar character and it can be

determined before trial that it is likely that evidence of one

charged offense would be admissible to prove another charged

offense,

(2) are based on the same act or transaction, or

(3) are based on two or more acts or transactions

connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme

or plan.

(b) Joinder of Defendants. Two or more defendants

may be charged in the same indictment or information if they

are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction

or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an

offense or offenses, or if the defendants are parties to an

express or tacit agreement to aid each other to commit an act or

transaction constituting a criminal offense or offenses. Such

defendants may be charged in one or more counts together or

separately and all of the defendants need not be charged in

each count. The disposition of the indictment or information as

to one of several defendants joined in the same indictment or

information shall not affect the right of the state to proceed

against the other defendants.

History

(Adopted by SCO 4 October 4, 1959; amended by SCO 906 effective nunc pro tunc May 28, 1988; by SCO 1092 effective July 15, 1992; corrected January, 1993) Note: SCO 906 incorporated changes in Criminal Rule 8(a) made by the legislature in ch. 66, §§ 8 and 9. SLA 1988. The legislation added the language in subparagraph (a)(1), “and it can be determined before trial that it is likely that evidence of one charged offense would be admissible to prove another charged offense.” Note: SCO 906 is amended by adding a new paragraph 3 which provides: “3. This order is made for the sole reason that the legislature has mandated the above amendments. If the act mandating these amendments is invalidated by a court of competent jurisdiction, this order shall be considered automatically rescinded.” This amendment is effective retroactively to May 28, 1988. Note: Paragraph (b) was amended by ch. 79, § 2, SLA 1991.

Provenance

Source
courts.alaska.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
9066d8851734e450f4db0b2ed207a6d7e382a38c9e6adda20f16afdff8a674eb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.