AK · rules
Alaska R. Crim. P. 39
Appointment of Counsel
(a) Informing Defendant of Right to Counsel. The
court shall advise a defendant who appears without counsel for
arraignment, change of plea, or trial of the right to be
represented by counsel, and ask if the defendant desires the aid
of counsel. The court shall not allow a defendant to proceed
without an attorney unless the defendant understands the
benefits of counsel and knowingly waives the right to counsel.
(b) Appointment of Counsel for Persons Financially
Unable to Employ Counsel.
(1) If a defendant desires the aid of counsel but claims a
financial inability to employ counsel, the court or its designee
shall determine whether the defendant is eligible for court-appointed counsel under Criminal Rule 39.1.
(2) Before the court appoints counsel for an indigent
defendant at public expense, the court shall advise the
defendant that the defendant will be ordered to repay the
prosecuting authority for the cost of appointed counsel, in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this rule, if the defendant is
convicted of an offense. The court may enter such orders as
appear reasonably necessary to prevent the defendant from
dissipating assets to avoid payment of this cost.
(3) If the court or its designee determines that a
defendant is eligible for court-appointed counsel under
Criminal Rule 39.1, the court shall appoint counsel pursuant to
Administrative Rule 12 and notify counsel of the appointment.
(4) In the absence of a request by a defendant otherwise
entitled to appointment of counsel, the court shall appoint
counsel unless the court finds that the defendant understands
the benefits of counsel and knowingly waives the right to
counsel.
(5) If the trial court denies a defendant’s request for
appointed counsel, the defendant may request review of this
decision by the presiding judge of the judicial district by filing
a motion with the trial court within three days after the date of
notice, as defined in Criminal Rule 32.3(c), of the denial. The
trial court shall forward the motion, relevant materials from the
court file, and an electronic recording of any relevant
proceedings to the presiding judge. The presiding judge or his
or her designee shall issue a decision within three days of
receipt of these materials.
(c) Costs of Appointed Counsel.
(1) Entry of Judgment.
(A) At the time of sentencing, revocation of probation,
denial of a motion to withdraw plea, and denial of an
application brought under Criminal Rule 35.1, the court shall
inquire whether there is good cause why the court should not
enter judgment for the cost of appointed counsel in the amount
set out in subsection (d) of this rule. If no one asserts good
cause to reduce the amount called for in subsection (d), the
court shall enter judgment against the defendant in that
amount. If it is alleged that there is good cause to reduce the
normal amount, the court may either decide the issue at that
time and enter judgment accordingly or schedule another
hearing to consider the issue.
(B) If the court finds that the actual cost of appointed
counsel is less than the amount of payment called for in
subsection (d), the court shall not enter judgment in an amount
greater than the actual cost of counsel.
(C) The judgment must be in writing. A copy of the
judgment must be served on the defendant. The judgment bears
interest at the rate specified in AS 09.30.070(a) from the date
judgment is entered. The court shall order the defendant to
apply for permanent fund dividends every year in which the
defendant qualifies for the dividend until the judgment is paid
in full.
(2) Collection.
(A) The judgment has the same force and effect as a
judgment in a civil action in favor of the prosecuting authority
and is subject to execution.
(B) All proceedings to enforce the judgment shall be in
accordance with the statutes and court rules applicable to civil
judgments. The judgment is not enforceable by contempt.
Payment of the judgment may not be made a condition of a
defendant’s probation. Default or failure to pay the judgment
may not affect or reduce the rendering of services on appeal or
any other phase of a defendant’s case in any way. A defendant
does not have a right to be represented by appointed counsel in
connection with proceedings under paragraph 39(c) or any
proceedings to collect the judgment.
(C) Upon showing of financial hardship, the court shall
allow a defendant subject to a judgment under this rule to
make payments under a repayment schedule. A defendant may
petition the court at any time for remission, reduction or
deferral of the unpaid portion of the judgment. The court may
remit or reduce the balance owing on the judgment or change
the method of payment if the payment would impose manifest
hardship on the defendant or the defendant’s immediate
family.
(D) Notwithstanding section 39(c)(2)(B), a defendant
may be held in contempt for failing to comply with an order
under this rule to apply for a permanent fund dividend.
(3) Appeal.
(A) If the defendant appeals the conviction, enforcement
of the judgment may be stayed by the trial court or the
appellate court upon such terms as the court deems proper.
(B) If the defendant’s conviction is reversed, the clerk
shall vacate the judgment and order the prosecuting authority
to repay all sums paid in satisfaction of the judgment, plus
interest at the rate specified in AS 09.30.070(a).
(d)
Schedule of Costs. Except for good cause shown as
provided in paragraph (c)(1), the following schedules govern
the assessment of costs of appointed counsel under subsection
(c). If a defendant is convicted of more than one offense in a
single dispositive court proceeding, costs shall be based on the
most serious offense of which the defendant is convicted. If a
defendant is otherwise convicted of more than one offense,
costs shall be separately assessed for each conviction. For good
cause shown, the court may waive the schedule of costs and
assess fees up to the actual cost of appointed counsel,
including actual expenses.
Misdemeanors
Trial
$500.00
Change of plea
200.00
Post-conviction relief or
contested probation revocation
proceedings in the trial court
250.00
Felonies
Class
Class A
Murder
B & C
and
in the
Unclassified
1st and
(Except
2nd
Murder)
Degrees
Trial
$1,500.00
$2,500.00
$5,000.00
Change of plea
after substantive
motion work and
hearing and
before trial
commences
1,000.00
1,500.00
2,500.00
Change of plea
post-indictment
but prior to
substantive
motion work
and hearing
500.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
Change of plea
prior to
indictment
250.00
500.00
750.00
Post-conviction
relief or probation revocation proceeding in trial court
250.00
500.00
750.00
(e) Review of Defendant’s Financial Condition.
(1) The court may review a defendant’s financial status
at any time after appointment of counsel to determine (A)
whether the defendant continues to be eligible for court-appointed counsel under Criminal Rule 39.1; or (B) whether
the defendant was eligible for court-appointed counsel when
the appointment was made.
(2) If the court determines that a defendant is no longer
eligible for court-appointed counsel under Criminal Rule 39.1,
the court may
(A) terminate the appointment; or
(B) continue the appointment and, at the conclusion of
the criminal proceedings against the defendant in the trial
court, enter judgment against the defendant for the actual cost
of appointed counsel, including actual expenses, from the date
of the change in the defendant’s financial status through the
conclusion of the trial court proceedings.
(3) If the court determines that a defendant was not
eligible for court-appointed counsel when the appointment was
made, the court may
(A) terminate the appointment and enter judgment against
the defendant for the actual costs of appointed counsel,
including actual expenses, from the date of appointment
through the date of termination; or
(B) continue the appointment and, at the conclusion of
the criminal proceedings against the defendant in the trial
court, enter judgment against the defendant for the actual cost
of appointed counsel from the date of the appointment through
the conclusion of the trial court proceedings.
(4) A defendant may request review of the court’s
decision to terminate the appointment according to the
procedure set out in subparagraph 39(b)(5).
(5) Judgment may be entered against a defendant under
this paragraph regardless of whether the defendant is convicted
of an offense.
History
(Adopted by SCO 4 October 4, 1959; amended by SCO 90 effective July 24, 1967: by SCO 157 effective February 15, 1973; by Amendment No. 4 to SCO 157 dated March 12, 1973; by SCO 187 effective July 2, 1974; by SCO 328 effective January 1, 1979; by SCO 448 effective November 24 1980; by SCO 677 effective June 15, 1986; and by SCO 888 effective July 15, 1988; rescinded and re-promulgated by SCO 1088 effective July 1, 1992; amended by SCO 1139 effective July 1, 1993; by SCO 1145 effective October 1, 1993; by SCO 1351 effective May 15, 1999; by SCO 1555 effective October 15, 2004; and by SCO 1566 effective May 15, 2005) Dissent to SCO 1088: RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice, with whom COMPTON, Justice, joins, dissenting: I am not persuaded that either existing Criminal Rule 39, or Appellate Rule 209, requires amendment. I think it can be safely predicted that these amendments will have a chilling effect on an indigent defendant’s obtaining the services of appointed counsel as well as on an indigent defendant’s decision whether or not to seek review or to appeal.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
391dcdda49b97697d29479d0fc96a57e654228b330f612adcfaaa335cc004162
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.