AK · rules
Alaska R. Civ. P. 58.2
Judgments for the Payment of Money
(a) Form Generally. In addition to identifying each
judgment creditor and each judgment debtor, a judgment for
the payment of money must include the following information,
if applicable, in the form shown in the sample judgments
published at the end of this rule:
(1) the principal amount of the judgment;
(2) the portion of the principal that accrues prejudgment
interest and the prejudgment interest rate, except as provided
in (b);
(3) the date from which prejudgment interest should be
calculated, except as provided in (b);
(4) a blank space for the court to fill in the amount of
prejudgment interest;
(5) the amount of punitive damages, if any;
(6) a blank space for the court to fill in the amount of
attorney’s fees awarded;
(7) a blank space for the court to fill in the amount of
costs awarded;
(8) a blank space for the total judgment amount;
(9) the post-judgment interest rate; and
(10) recognition of any interest by the State of Alaska in a
punitive damages verdict.
(b) Prejudgment Interest. The total amount of prejudgment interest will be calculated by the court. If more
than one interest rate applies or interest is calculated from
more than one date, the interest rate and date should not be
listed in the judgment as provided in (a). Instead, the party
preparing the judgment must submit a separate computation
sheet showing the interest calculations, including all applicable
interest rates and dates, any payments, and how payments were
applied to interest, costs, and principal.
(c) Identification of Judgment Creditors and Judgment Debtors. When identifying judgment creditors and
judgment debtors, the party preparing the judgment must
include as much of each person’s full legal name as is known
to that party and each person’s date of birth, if known to that
party.
(d) Name of Judge. In a proposed judgment, the name of
the judge, if known, must be typed under the judge’s signature
line.
(e) Child Support Orders. This rule does not apply to
child support orders. The form of child support orders is
governed by Civil Rule 90.3(j).
(f) Rejection for Noncompliance. The clerk may reject
proposed judgments that do not comply with this rule and Civil
Rule 76.
History
(Adopted by SCO 1415 effective October 15, 2000; and amended by SCO 1699 effective October 15, 2009) SAMPLE JUDGMENT WITHOUT PUNITIVE DAMAGES (not to scale) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE BARBARA A. JONES, ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) MARY JANE SMITH and ) FRED R. SMITH, ) Case No. 3AN-00-1234CI ) Defendants. ) FINAL JUDGMENT ______________________________________ ) IT IS ORDERED that judgment is entered as follows: 1. Plaintiff Barbara Ann Jones, d.o.b. 1/24/57, shall recover from and have judgment against defendants Mary Jane Smith, d.o.b. 1/26/56, and Frederick Ronald Smith, d.o.b. 3/24/56, jointly and severally, as follows: a. Principal Amount $ ______ b. Prejudgment Interest on $ ______ $ ______ (computed at the annual rate of ______% from ________ to date of judgment) c. Sub-Total: $ ______ d. Attorney’s Fees $ ______ Date Awarded: _________ Judge: ___________ e. Costs $ ______ Date Awarded: _________ Clerk: ___________ f. TOTAL JUDGMENT: $ ______ g. Post-Judgment Interest Rate: ______ % 2. (non-monetary provision) ______________ _____________________________ Date George W. Black Superior Court Judge DO NOT USE THIS FORM IF PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE AWARDED. SAMPLE JUDGMENT WITH PUNITIVE DAMAGES (not to scale) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE BARBARA A. JONES, ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) MARY JANE SMITH and ) FRED R. SMITH, ) Case No. 3AN-00-1234CI ) Defendants. ) FINAL JUDGMENT ______________________________________ ) IT IS ORDERED that judgment is entered as follows: 1. Plaintiff Barbara Ann Jones, d.o.b. 1/24/57, shall recover from and have judgment against defendants Mary Jane Smith, d.o.b. 1/26/56, and Frederick Ronald Smith, d.o.b. 3/24/56, jointly and severally, as follows: a. Principal Amount $ ______ b. Prejudgment Interest on $ ______ $ ______ (computed at the annual rate of ______% from ________ to date of judgment) c. Punitive Damage Award $ ______ d. Sub-Total: $ ______ e. Attorney’s Fees $ ______ Date Awarded: ___________ Judge: ___________ f. Costs $ ______ Date Awarded: ___________ Clerk: ___________ g. SUB-TOTAL JUDGMENT: $ ______ h. Subtract Judgment in favor of state from line 3.b. ($ _____ ) i. TOTAL JUDGMENT $ ______ j. Post-Judgment Interest Rate: _____% 2. (non-monetary provision) Punitive Damages to the State of Alaska (Rule 78(c) requires the party preparing the prosposed judgment to serve notice on the Attorney General in Juneau) 3. 50% of Punitive Damage Award $ ______ a. Subtract attorney’s fees and/or costs apportioned to state ($ _____) b. Judgment in favor of the State of Alaska: $ ______ c. Post-Judgment Interest Rate _____% ______________ _____________________________ Date George W. Black Superior Court Judge
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
e23b9b21e93b826ddb4f36fb3008bdeff1b3bf429ed6d28479a5fbd1e5bf504e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.