AK · rules
Alaska R. Civ. P. 23
Class Actions
(a) Prerequisites to a Class Action. One or more
members of a class may sue or be sued as representative
parties on behalf of all only if (1) the class is so numerous that
joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions
of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses
of the representative parties are typical of the claims or
defenses of the class, and (4) the representative parties will
fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
(b) Class Actions Maintainable. An action may be
maintained as a class action if the prerequisites of subdivision
(a) are satisfied, and in addition:
(1) The prosecution of separate actions by or against
individual members of the class would create a risk of
(A) Inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to
individual members of the class which would establish
incompatible standards of conduct for the party opposing the
class, or
(B) Adjudications with respect to individual members of
the class which would as a practical matter be dispositive of
the interests of the other members not parties to the
adjudications or substantially impair or impede their ability to
protect their interests; or
(2) The party opposing the class has acted or refuses to
act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby
making appropriate final injunctive relief or corresponding
declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole; or
(3) The court finds that the questions of law or fact
common to the members of the class predominate over any
questions affecting only individual members, and that a class
action is superior to other available methods for the fair and
efficient adjudication of the controversy. The matters pertinent
to the finding include: (A) the interest of members of the class
in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of
separate actions; (B) the extent and nature of any litigation
concerning the controversy already commenced by or against
members of the class; (C) the desirability or undesirability of
concentrating the litigation of the claims in the particular
forum; (D) the difficulties likely to be encountered in the
management of a class action.
(c) Determination by Order Whether Class Action to
Be Maintained—Notice—Judgment—Actions Conducted
Partially as Class Actions.
(1) As soon as practicable after the commencement of an
action brought as a class action, the court shall determine by
order whether it is to be so maintained. An order under this
subdivision may be conditional, and may be altered or
amended before the decision on the merits.
(2) In any class action maintained under subdivision (b)
(3), the court shall direct to the members of the class the best notice practicable under the circumstances, including individual notice to all members who can be identified through
reasonable effort. The notice shall advise each member that
(A) the court will exclude the member from the class if the
member so requests by a specified date; (B) the judgment,
whether favorable or not, will include all members who do not
request exclusion; and (C) any member who does not request
exclusion may, if the member desires, enter an appearance
through his counsel.
(3) The judgment in an action maintained as a class
action under subdivision (b) (1) or (b) (2), whether or not
favorable to the class, shall include and describe those whom
the court finds to be members of the class. The judgment in the
action maintained as a class action under subdivision (b) (3),
whether or not favorable to the class, shall include and specify
or describe those to whom the notice provided in subdivision
(c) (2) was directed, and who have not requested exclusion,
and whom the court finds to be members of the class.
(4) When appropriate (A) an action may be brought or
maintained as a class action with respect to particular issues, or
(B) a class may be divided into subclasses and each subclass
treated as a class, and the provisions of this rule shall then be
construed and applied accordingly.
(d) Orders in Conduct of Actions. In the conduct of
actions to which this rule applies, the court may make
appropriate orders: (1) determining the course of proceedings
or prescribing measures to prevent undue repetition or
complication in the presentation of evidence or argument; (2)
requiring, for the protection of the members of the class or
otherwise for the fair conduct of the action, that notice be
given in such manner as the court may direct to some or all of
the members of any step in the action, or of the proposed
extent of the judgment, or of the opportunity of members to
signify whether they consider the representation fair and
adequate, to intervene and present claims or defenses, or
otherwise to come into the action; (3) imposing conditions on
the representative parties or on intervenors; (4) requiring that
the pleadings be amended to eliminate therefrom allegations as
to representation of absent persons, and that the action proceed
accordingly; (5) dealing with similar procedural matters. The
orders may be combined with an order under Rule 16, and may
be altered or amended as may be desirable from time to time.
(e) Dismissal or Compromise. A class action shall not
be dismissed or compromised without the approval of the
court, and notice of the proposed dismissal or compromise
shall be given to all members of the class in such manner as
the court directs.
History
(Adopted by SCO 5 October 9, 1959; rescinded and promulgated by SCO 258 effective November 15, 1976; amended by SCO 1153 effective July 15, 1994; by SCO 1163 effective July 15, 1994; and by SCO 1361 effective October 15, 1999) Note: Chapter 79 § 2 SLA 1999 enacts AS 09.65.260(c), which relates to class actions for damages arising from the year 2000 date change and caused directly or indirectly by a failure of an electronic computing device. According to § 4 of the act, the enactment of AS 09.65.260(c) has the effect of amending Civil Rule 23, by requiring, in a class action relating to the year 2000 date change, that the aggregate claim of all members of the class for economic loss exceeds $150,000.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
3fffb4ce3eebcf58bf21d08e927c3073d76ed284351a38639b4c7a25ca9ce25e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.