Bindinglaw

AK · rules

Alaska CINA R. 9

Evidence

activein force · 2023-07-11 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Applicability of Evidence Rules. The Alaska Rules

of Evidence apply to child in need of aid proceedings to the

same extent as they govern civil proceedings, except as

otherwise provided by these rules.

(b) Privileges Inapplicable.

(1) Spousal Privilege. The spousal privilege, Evidence

Rule 505, does not apply to the parent, child or custodian in

Child in Need of Aid proceedings.

(2) Physician-Patient Privilege. The physician-patient

privilege, Evidence Rule 504, does not apply to the parent,

child or custodian in Child in Need of Aid proceedings.

(3) Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege.

(A) The psychotherapist-patient privilege, Evidence Rule

504, applies to the parent, child or custodian in Child in Need

of Aid proceedings only to the extent described in this rule.

(B) The privilege applies to the child unless the child or

the child’s guardian ad litem waives the privilege, or the party

seeking disclosure shows that the need for the requested

disclosure outweighs the child’s interest in confidentiality.

(C) The privilege does not apply to the parent unless the

parent shows that the parent’s interest in confidentiality

outweighs the need for the requested disclosure. No disclosure

may be made until the parent has an opportunity to make this

showing.

(D) When considering a request to disclose or protect a

communication, the court shall consider the following:

(i) the content and nature of the communication;

(ii) the purposes of AS 47.10, as expressed by AS

47.06.020, and of Evidence Rule 504;

(iii) whether there is any other effective way to obtain the

information; and

(iv) whether the public interest and need for disclosure

outweighs the potential injury to the patient and the patient’s

psychotherapist relationship.

Before ruling on such a request, the court may inspect

records in camera. The court may allow, limit, or prohibit

disclosure and use of the communication.

(E) If the court grants the request for disclosure of the

child’s privileged information, the court order must:

(i) limit disclosure to those parts of the child’s records

which are essential to fulfill the purpose of the disclosure;

(ii) limit disclosure to those persons whose need for the

information is the basis for the order; and

(iii) include such other measures as are necessary to limit

disclosure for the protection of the child and the

psychotherapist-patient relationship.

(F) Evidence Rule 504(c) does not apply in child in need

of aid proceedings. Unless otherwise ordered, the child’s

psychotherapist-patient privilege may only be claimed or

waived as follows:

(i) If the child is twelve or older, the privilege may be

claimed or waived by the child after consulting with an

attorney, if an attorney has been appointed, or with the

guardian ad litem.

(ii) If the child is younger than twelve, the privilege may

be claimed or waived by the guardian ad litem.

(iii) The person who was the psychotherapist at the time

of the communication is presumed to have authority to claim

the privilege on behalf of the child.

History

(SCO 845 effective August 15, 1987; amended by SCO 1355 effective July 15, 1999;by SCO 1442 effective October 15, 2001; by SCO 1987 effective nunc pro tunc to July 1, 2022; and by SCO 1998 effective July 11, 2023) Cross References CROSS REFERENCE: AS 47.17.060.

Provenance

Source
courts.alaska.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
bf3e3482a472b95d819bc841b0f9ceabb60baf0d23da321aeb106300b784672a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Alaska CINA R. 9 — Evidence · binding.law