AK · rules
Alaska CINA R. 25
Expedited Enforcement of Tribal Court Orders under the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1963)
(a) Availability of Expedited Enforcement. A verified
petition for expedited enforcement and request for writ of
assistance may be filed in accordance with this rule for any
tribal court order for which registration has been sought under
CINA Rule 24.
(b) Contents of the Verified Petition. The verified
petition shall set forth the following facts:
(1) whether the tribal court that issued the order
identified the jurisdictional basis it relied on in exercising
jurisdiction and, if so, what the basis was;
(2) whether a proceeding has been commenced in state
court or tribal court that could affect the current proceedings,
including proceedings relating to domestic violence protective
orders, termination of parental rights, and adoptions and, if so,
the name of the court, the case number, and the nature of the
proceeding;
(3) the present physical address of the child and the
person or persons having physical or legal custody, if known;
(4) whether relief in addition to the immediate physical
custody of the child is sought and, if so, the relief sought;
(5) if the child custody order has been registered and
confirmed under CINA Rule 24 and, if so, the date and place
of registration;
(6) whether the petitioner will request a writ of
assistance; and
(7) a statement explaining why expedited enforcement is
necessary.
(c) Ex Parte Hearing to Issue Writ of Assistance. A
petitioner may request a writ of assistance in any case where a
child has been removed or is in imminent danger of being
removed from the person with whom the tribal court ordered
placement. The court may conduct an ex parte hearing for
further fact finding. If the court finds that a child has been
removed or is in immediate danger of being removed from the
person with whom the tribal court ordered placement, the court
may issue a writ of assistance as follows:
(1) reciting the facts supporting the conclusion that
immediate removal from the person with whom the tribal court
ordered placement has or will occur;
(2) directing law enforcement officials to take physical
custody of the child immediately;
(3) providing for return to the person with whom the
tribal court ordered placement;
(4) if less intrusive remedies are not effective,
authorizing law enforcement officers to enter private property
to take physical custody of the child;
(5) if required by exigent circumstances, authorizing law
enforcement officers to make a forcible entry at any hour; and
(6) serving the petition for expedited enforcement, the
writ of assistance, and orders to appear or to protect the safety
of the parties or the child immediately after the child is taken
into physical custody.
(d) Hearing. Except where service occurs in accordance
with paragraph (c)(6), the court shall serve the petition for
expedited enforcement on the respondent and any person
served with the petition for registration pursuant to CINA Rule
24(b)(4). The verified petition for expedited enforcement of a
child custody order shall be heard on the next judicial day after
the petition is served unless that date is impossible, in which
case the court shall hold the hearing on the first judicial day
possible. On the filing of a petition, the court shall issue an
order directing the respondent to appear in person with or
without the child at a hearing and may enter an order necessary
to ensure the safety of the parties and the child. The order must
state the time and place of the hearing and advise the
respondent that, at the hearing, the court will order that
immediate physical custody of the child be delivered to the
person with whom the tribal court ordered placement, and that
such further hearings as necessary may be scheduled unless the
respondent appears and establishes that:
(1) the child custody order has not been registered and
confirmed and that:
(A) the tribal court did not have jurisdiction over the
parties or the child custody proceeding in which the tribal child
custody order was entered;
(B) the child custody order for which enforcement is
sought has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court having
jurisdiction to do so; or
(C) the respondent was entitled to notice, but notice was
not given in a manner reasonably calculated to give actual
notice of the proceedings before the court that issued the order
for which enforcement is sought, or if notice was given, the
respondent was not given an opportunity to be heard; or
(2) the child custody order for which enforcement is
sought was registered and confirmed but has been vacated,
stayed, or modified by a court having jurisdiction to do so.
(e) Orders and Enforceability.
(1) The court may order such further relief as appropriate
under Alaska law.
(2) A writ of assistance directing law enforcement to
take physical custody of a child is enforceable throughout this
state.
(f) Conditions on Placement of the Child. The superior
court issuing an order or writ of assistance under this rule may
impose conditions on the placement of the child to ensure the
appearance of the child and child’s custodian at subsequent
hearings.
History
(SCO 1784 effective October 1, 2014) Note: Under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. § 1911(d), tribal court orders entered in Indian child custody proceedings are entitled to the same full faith and credit that is given to orders entered by state courts. To qualify for full faith and credit, the issuing court must have personal and subject matter jurisdiction and render its judgment in accordance with minimum due process.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
d5ea4573c779aac84d0f2628bee08c045379107bf3461abe5f7be61992a4748e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.