Bindinglaw

AK · rules

Alaska CINA R. 15

Adjudication Hearing

activein force · 1999-07-15 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Nature and Timing of Proceeding. The adjudication

hearing is a trial to the court on the merits of the petition for

adjudication. The adjudication must be completed within 120

days after a finding of probable cause is entered, unless the

court finds good cause to continue the hearing. In determining

whether to grant a continuance for good cause, the court shall

take into consideration the age of the child and the potential

adverse effect that the delay may have on the child.

(b) Notice. The Department must provide notice of the

adjudication hearing to the persons specified in CINA Rule

7(b) within a reasonable time prior to the hearing. In cases

involving an Indian child, notice of the hearing must be

received at least ten days before the hearing pursuant to CINA

Rule 7(f)(1). Upon request, the court shall postpone the

hearing to ensure that the Indian child’s parents, Indian

custodian or tribe have had thirty days from receipt of the

notice to prepare for the hearing.

(c) Burden of Proof. The Department has the burden of

proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the child is a

child in need of aid.

(d) Judgment. At the conclusion of the adjudication

hearing, the court shall make findings of fact and enter a

judgment that the child is or is not a child in need of aid.

(e) Failure of Proof. If the court finds that the child is

not a child in need of aid, it shall immediately order the child

released from the Department’s custody and returned to the

child’s parents, guardian, or custodian.

(f) Orders Pending Disposition. If the court finds that

the child is a child in need of aid and the disposition is not held

immediately following the adjudication, the court shall enter

the following orders:

(1) The court shall order the child placed in the

temporary custody of the Department or order the child

returned to the home with supervision by the Department

pending disposition. The court may approve the removal of the

child from the child’s home only if the court makes the

findings required by CINA Rule 10(c)(3).

(2) If the court approves the child’s removal, the court

shall make the inquiry and findings required by CINA Rule

10.1. A finding that the Department has failed to make

reasonable efforts, or, in cases involving an Indian child, that

the requirements of 25 U.S.C. §§ 1912(d) or 1915(b) have not

been met, is not in itself a ground for returning the child to the

home and does not affect the court’s ability to enter an

adjudication order and extend temporary custody pending

adjudication.

(3) The court shall set a time for the disposition hearing,

which will be held without unreasonable delay. The court shall

order a predisposition report, unless waived by stipulation

under CINA Rule 16(a)(3), and other studies, examinations, or

reports under CINA Rule 16 that are necessary for an informed

disposition.

History

(SCO 845 effective August 15, 1987; amended by SCO 855 effective January 15, 1988; by SCO 1010 effective January 15, 1990; and by SCO 1355 effective July 15, 1999) Note: Ch. 43, SLA 2001, amends AS 47.10.030, AS 47.10.070(a), and AS 47.10.080(f) to add provisions concerning notice to and participation by grandparents. According to §6 of the Act, these provisions have the effect of amending Child in Need of Aid Rules 3, 7, 10, 15, 17, and 19 by requiring that grandparents be given notice of and an opportunity to be heard at certain child-in-need-of-aid proceedings. Cross References CROSS REFERENCE: AS 47.10.080(a); AS 47.10.081; AS 47.10.141(g); 25 U.S.C. § 1912.

Provenance

Source
courts.alaska.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
cbeb007264abaedde7b7918ca8cdc2c5ab87c0d7994b51bfd6f1155917e89b1e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Alaska CINA R. 15 — Adjudication Hearing · binding.law