AK · rules
Alaska CINA R. 15
Adjudication Hearing
(a) Nature and Timing of Proceeding. The adjudication
hearing is a trial to the court on the merits of the petition for
adjudication. The adjudication must be completed within 120
days after a finding of probable cause is entered, unless the
court finds good cause to continue the hearing. In determining
whether to grant a continuance for good cause, the court shall
take into consideration the age of the child and the potential
adverse effect that the delay may have on the child.
(b) Notice. The Department must provide notice of the
adjudication hearing to the persons specified in CINA Rule
7(b) within a reasonable time prior to the hearing. In cases
involving an Indian child, notice of the hearing must be
received at least ten days before the hearing pursuant to CINA
Rule 7(f)(1). Upon request, the court shall postpone the
hearing to ensure that the Indian child’s parents, Indian
custodian or tribe have had thirty days from receipt of the
notice to prepare for the hearing.
(c) Burden of Proof. The Department has the burden of
proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the child is a
child in need of aid.
(d) Judgment. At the conclusion of the adjudication
hearing, the court shall make findings of fact and enter a
judgment that the child is or is not a child in need of aid.
(e) Failure of Proof. If the court finds that the child is
not a child in need of aid, it shall immediately order the child
released from the Department’s custody and returned to the
child’s parents, guardian, or custodian.
(f) Orders Pending Disposition. If the court finds that
the child is a child in need of aid and the disposition is not held
immediately following the adjudication, the court shall enter
the following orders:
(1) The court shall order the child placed in the
temporary custody of the Department or order the child
returned to the home with supervision by the Department
pending disposition. The court may approve the removal of the
child from the child’s home only if the court makes the
findings required by CINA Rule 10(c)(3).
(2) If the court approves the child’s removal, the court
shall make the inquiry and findings required by CINA Rule
10.1. A finding that the Department has failed to make
reasonable efforts, or, in cases involving an Indian child, that
the requirements of 25 U.S.C. §§ 1912(d) or 1915(b) have not
been met, is not in itself a ground for returning the child to the
home and does not affect the court’s ability to enter an
adjudication order and extend temporary custody pending
adjudication.
(3) The court shall set a time for the disposition hearing,
which will be held without unreasonable delay. The court shall
order a predisposition report, unless waived by stipulation
under CINA Rule 16(a)(3), and other studies, examinations, or
reports under CINA Rule 16 that are necessary for an informed
disposition.
History
(SCO 845 effective August 15, 1987; amended by SCO 855 effective January 15, 1988; by SCO 1010 effective January 15, 1990; and by SCO 1355 effective July 15, 1999) Note: Ch. 43, SLA 2001, amends AS 47.10.030, AS 47.10.070(a), and AS 47.10.080(f) to add provisions concerning notice to and participation by grandparents. According to §6 of the Act, these provisions have the effect of amending Child in Need of Aid Rules 3, 7, 10, 15, 17, and 19 by requiring that grandparents be given notice of and an opportunity to be heard at certain child-in-need-of-aid proceedings. Cross References CROSS REFERENCE: AS 47.10.080(a); AS 47.10.081; AS 47.10.141(g); 25 U.S.C. § 1912.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
cbeb007264abaedde7b7918ca8cdc2c5ab87c0d7994b51bfd6f1155917e89b1e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.