Bindinglaw

AK · rules

Alaska Bar R. 52

Consideration by Committee

activein force · 1994-07-15 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Upon receipt of an application the Committee shall

conduct such investigations and hold such hearings as it

determines necessary to establish whether the application

should be granted. Hearings will be conducted informally.

Both the applicant and the lawyer shall be afforded

opportunities to present argument and evidence, and to cross-examine opposing witnesses. The Committee may request the

attorney selected pursuant to Rule 47(a) to present argument

and evidence, if the Committee believes this will assist it in

reaching its decision.

The Committee shall provide a copy of the application to

the lawyer complained of and shall notify the lawyer and the

applicant of the date and time for a hearing on the application.

(b) The Committee may delegate responsibility for

holding a hearing to a subcommittee of one or more of its

members. The subcommittee shall prepare a proposed report

containing the information required by Rule 52(c), which shall

be promptly considered by the Committee. The Committee

shall (1) approve and adopt the proposed report, or (2) remand

the proposed report to the same or a different subcommittee for

the taking of further evidence or for preparation of a new

proposed report, or (3) consider the matter de novo on the basis

of the record made at hearing.

(c) At the conclusion of the Committee’s consideration

of an application pursuant to this Rule, it shall promptly make

and transmit to the office of the Alaska Bar Association a

report consisting of a brief statement of the proceedings had,

clear and concise findings of fact adopted by the Committee a

brief statement of its conclusions and a recommendation to the

Board.

(d) Upon receipt of the report, the Executive Director

shall provide copies of it to the attorney or the attorney’s

representative and the claimant.

(e) Within twenty (20) days of receiving notice of the

filing of the report with the Board, any party may file written

objections to the report.

History

(Added by SCO 214 effective January 1, 1976; amended by SCO 409 effective, nunc pro tunc, January 1, 1980; by SCO 722 effective December 15, 1986; by SCO 867 effective July 15, 1988; by SCO 1029 effective July 15, 1990; by SCO 1064 effective July 15, 1991; and by SCO 1153 effective July 15, 1994)

Provenance

Source
courts.alaska.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
5effa6aca4d93720acc1ebef5f9c8f3581572a4c3bcd15192924ab8385d3eb0e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Alaska Bar R. 52 — Consideration by Committee · binding.law