AK · rules
Alaska R. App. P. 603
Stays
(a) Civil Appeals.
(1) Automatic Stay. An automatic two day stay of
execution or enforcement of district court judgments is
provided for in District Court Civil Rule 24(a). A motion for
stay and bond are not required for this stay.
(2) Stay Upon Appeal—Supersedeas Bond.
(A) Stay. When an appeal is taken, the appellant may
obtain a stay of proceedings to enforce the judgment by filing a
supersedeas bond. The stay is effective when the supersedeas
bond is approved. The filing of a supersedeas bond does not
prohibit the court from considering the public interest in
deciding whether to impose or continue a stay on that portion
of an administrative or district court judgment which is not
limited to monetary relief.
(B) Request for Approval. A supersedeas bond, with a
Request for Approval of Supersedeas Bond, must be served
and filed with the district court, or with the superior court in
administrative appeals. The bond may be filed at or after the
time for filing the notice of appeal.
(C) Amount and Form. The amount of the supersedeas
bond is 125% of the district court or administrative agency
judgment (including any prejudgment interest, costs and
attorney’s fees), except that the court may specify a different
amount based on the standard provided by Rule 204(d) upon
motion by any party to the appeal. The form and conditions of
the bond are governed by Civil Rule 80 and Appellate Rule
204(d).
(D) Objections—Reconsideration. An appellee may by
motion raise objections to the form or amount of the bond or to
the sufficiency of the surety. However, approval of the bond
will not be delayed to allow objections to be filed. Objections
filed after the supersedeas bond has been approved will be
treated as a motion to rescind or modify the approval to be
decided by the judge.
(E) Approval. The clerk may approve a supersedeas
bond upon filing if: (i) the bond is in the form prescribed
above; (ii) the amount of the bond is 125% of the judgment or,
if the judge has ordered a different amount, in the amount
ordered by the judge; and (iii) the bond is in cash pursuant to
Rule 602(g) or is executed by approved surety companies.
Otherwise, the judge must decide whether to approve the bond.
(F) Exemption. The state or an officer or agency thereof
or a municipality or an officer or agency thereof desiring a stay
on appeal is exempt from the requirement of filing a
supersedeas bond.
(3) Stay in License Revocation Appeals. The court may
not stay a license revocation ordered under AS 28.15.166
unless the court finds that there is a reasonable probability that
the appellant will prevail on the merits, that the appellant will
suffer irreparable harm if the order is not stayed, and, in a case
where the appellant operates a commercial motor vehicle, that
the public can be adequately protected by conditions imposed
by the court.
(4) Proceedings on Stay. When an appeal is taken, the
district court judge or magistrate judge shall enter a written
order indicating whether or not the proceedings to enforce a
judgment have been stayed. If the proceedings are stayed, and
process has been issued to enforce the judgment, the judge or
magistrate judge must recall the process by written notice to
the officer holding the process. Thereupon the process must be
returned to the court, and all property seized or levied upon by
virtue of such process must be released if it has not been sold,
and in cases of civil arrest, the person arrested must be released
from custody. This subdivision of this rule will not be
construed as making any stay retroactive or as invalidating any
proceedings or levies prior to the time the stay becomes
effective.
(5) Stay in Prisoner Disciplinary Appeals. The court may
not stay imposition of sanctions arising from a disciplinary
decision of the Department of Corrections unless the court
finds that the prisoner has alleged a violation of a fundamental
constitutional right and is likely to succeed on the merits of the
appeal, that the prisoner faces irreparable harm if a stay is not
granted, that the Department of Corrections can be adequately
protected if a stay is granted, and that a stay will not adversely
affect the public interest in effective penal administration. In
evaluating the stay motion, the court may consider documents
and affidavits offered by either party, and shall consider the
stay motion without waiting for the record to be prepared.
(b) Criminal Appeals. If a sentence of imprisonment is
imposed, the court may admit the defendant to bail and stay the
sentence as provided by law and by these rules, pending
appeal. A sentence to pay a fine or a fine and costs may be
stayed, if an appeal is taken, by the district judge or magistrate
judge or by the superior court upon such terms as the court
deems proper. During appeal the court may require the
defendant to deposit the whole or any part of the fine and costs
in the registry of the superior court, or to give bond for the
payment thereof, or to submit to an examination of assets, and
it may make an appropriate order to restrain the defendant
from dissipating his or her assets. An order placing the
defendant on probation will be stayed if an appeal is taken.
History
(SCO 439 effective November 15, 1980; amended by SCO 554 effective April 4, 1983; by SCO 957 effective March 30, 1989; by SCO 1015 effective January 15, 1990; by SCO 1109 effective January 15, 1993; by SCO 1238 effective July 15, 1996; by SCO 1385 effective April 15, 2000; by SCO 1671 effective October 15, 2008; by SCO 1732 effective nunc pro tunc to July 1, 2010; and by SCO 1829 effective October 15, 2014) Note: AS 28.15.166(n), added by § 3 ch. 77 SLA 1983 and amended by § 10 ch. 119 SLA 1990 and by § 6 ch. 3 SLA 1992, amended Appellate Rule 603 by prohibiting an automatic stay of the administrative revocation of a driver’s license pending appeal and by limiting the power of the court to stay the administrative revocation of a driver’s license. Subparagraph 603(a)(4) was added by SCO 1109 in order to incorporate the legislative changes to the rule. In the event the legislation mandating the changes is invalidated by a court of competent jurisdiction, SCO 1109 shall be considered automatically rescinded. Note to SCO 1238: Appellate Rule 603(a)(6) was added by ch. 79 § 22 SLA 1995. Section 9 of this order is adopted for the sole reason that the legislature has mandated the amendment. Note: Chapter 19, section 29, SLA 2010 (HB 324), effective July 1, 2010, amended Appellate Rule 603(b) relating to release before trial, before sentence, and pending appeal, as reflected in section 5 of this Order. The changes to Appellate Rule 603 are adopted for the sole reason that the legislature has mandated the amendments.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
04bcf64dc932c77f9562fdebce305d770b0e46ca405b427439be4752f1ab895c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.