Bindinglaw

AK · rules

Alaska Adoption R. 17

Challenges to Validity of Adoption Decree

activein force · 1990-01-15 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Procedure. A person may move to set aside the

decree by filing a motion stating the grounds for challenging

the validity of the decree, with service on other parties, subject

to the time limitations of AS 25.23.140(b) and (c), and 25

U.S.C. Section 1913(d). The court shall schedule a hearing

after reasonable notice to the parties. At the hearing, the

burden is on the party challenging the decree to show by a

preponderance of the evidence that the decree is not valid.

(b) Petition under 25 U.S.C. Section 1914. A petition

alleging a violation of any provision of 25 U.S.C. Section

1911, 1912 or 1913 is governed by the procedures set out in

CINA Rule 20.

History

(SCO 972 effective January 15, 1990)

Provenance

Source
courts.alaska.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
f10f7595f00f25e1b6d51e669690ec991d7f9a528d16501131aeae03afa233da
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Alaska Adoption R. 17 — Challenges to Validity of Ado… · binding.law