AK · rules
Alaska R. Admin. 23
Appointment of Former Justices and Judges to Pro Tempore Judicial Service
(a) Appointment to Pro Tempore Judicial Service.
(1) Method of Appointment. Former judicial officers who
have been accepted for inclusion in the administrative
director’s pro tempore appointment list may be appointed to sit
pro tempore as a senior judge in any court of this state when
the judicial assignment is deemed necessary for the efficient
administration of justice and the former judicial officer
consents to the appointment. Pro tempore appointments shall
be made by the chief justice, or by another justice designated
by the chief justice, in consultation with the administrative
director and the presiding judge or chief judge of the affected
court.
(2) Scope or Term of Appointment. Pro tempore
appointments may be made for one or more specified cases, or
for a specified period of time, or a combination of both.
Appointments may be renewed. A pro tempore judge may
complete a trial, including sentencing, or an appeal in progress
at the conclusion of the judge’s term of appointment. Unless a
judge’s order of appointment specifies otherwise, the judge’s
pro tempore appointment to a case in a trial court terminates
upon expiration of the time for filing an appeal except the pro
tempore judge may preside over immediate post-judgment
proceedings such as deciding restitution in a criminal case or
ruling on attorney fees and costs in a civil case. Unless a
judge’s order of appointment specifies otherwise, the judge’s
pro tempore appointment to a case in an appellate court
terminates upon expiration of the time for filing a petition for
rehearing or, if a petition for rehearing is filed, upon entry of
the order or opinion that disposes of the petition.
(b) Eligibility to Apply for Inclusion in the Administrative Director’s Pro Tempore Appointment List.
(1) Eligibility to Apply. Former justices of the supreme
court, former judges of the court of appeals and the superior
court, and former judges of the district court who were
appointed by the governor are eligible to apply for inclusion in
the administrative director’s pro tempore appointment list
unless the former justice or judge
(A) was rejected in a retention election,
(B) was removed from office by the supreme court
pursuant to disciplinary proceedings instituted by the
Commission on Judicial Conduct,
(C) was removed from office by legislative impeachment
proceedings,
(D)
resigned from office while disciplinary or impeachment proceedings were pending,
(E) resigned or was removed from office because of
incapacity, or
(F) is no longer a resident of Alaska.
(2) Restoration of Eligibility. Judicial officers who
would be ineligible to apply for inclusion in the pro tempore
appointment list under subparagraphs (b)(1)(A) – (E) of this
rule become eligible for appointment if they are subsequently
nominated for judicial office by the Alaska Judicial Council
and appointed by the governor.
(c) The Pro Tempore Appointment List.
(1) The administrative director shall maintain a list of
judges who can be considered for appointment to pro tempore
judicial service. A former judge may be included in this list if
(A) the judge is eligible to apply for inclusion in the list
under subsection (b) of this rule,
(B) the judge applies for inclusion in the list and declares
his or her willingness to accept pro tempore appointments, and
(C) the chief justice, in consultation with the administrative director, determines that inclusion of the judge in the
pro tempore appointment list will be consistent with efficient
judicial administration and the Court System’s budgetary
constraints, and that the judge possesses the skills and
temperament required for satisfactorily performing pro
tempore judicial duties.
(2) Former judges who wish to be included in the pro
tempore appointment list shall apply to the administrative
director using the application form specified by the director.
This application form must require the judges to
(A) acknowledge that, if they are accepted for inclusion
in the pro tempore appointment list, they will be bound by all
provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct that apply to senior
judges until they formally withdraw from the appointment list
as prescribed in paragraph (c)(4);
(B) certify that they have read the applicable provisions
of the Code of Judicial Conduct and that they are currently in
compliance with those provisions; and
(C) agree that they will promptly withdraw from the pro
tempore appointment list if they cease being residents of
Alaska.
(3) The administrative director and the chief justice shall
review a judge’s application for inclusion in the pro tempore appointment list, applying the criteria specified in subparagraph (c)(1)(C). The administrative director shall
promptly notify judges when their application for inclusion in
the pro tempore appointment list has been granted or denied.
Judges who are accepted for inclusion in the pro tempore
appointment list become senior judges for purposes of the
Code of Judicial Conduct.
(4) A former judge who has been accepted for inclusion
in the pro tempore appointment list may withdraw from the list
by notifying the administrative director in writing. If the
judge’s withdrawal will terminate one or more current pro
tempore judicial appointments, the administrative director shall
notify the presiding judges or chief judge of the affected
courts.
(5) The following procedures govern the re-evaluation of
judges on the pro tempore appointment list:
(A) Every two years, the administrative director and the
chief justice shall review the performance of all judges who
have served pro tempore during the preceding two years. This
biennial review shall include the results of any evaluation of
the pro tempore judge’s performance by the Alaska Judicial
Council. The biennial review shall also include formal
evaluations of the judge’s performance by each of the
presiding judges or chief judge of the courts where the judge
served pro tempore. At the conclusion of this biennial review,
the chief justice, in consultation with the administrative
director, shall determine whether the judge will remain on the
pro tempore appointment list.
(B) In addition to the biennial review required by
subparagraph (c)(5)(A), the administrative director and the
chief justice may, at any time, assess any judge’s continued
inclusion in the pro tempore appointment list if they receive
new information which raises a significant question as to
whether the inclusion of that judge in the appointment list
remains consistent with efficient judicial administration and
the Court System’s budgetary constraints, or whether that
judge possesses the skills and temperament required for
satisfactorily performing pro tempore judicial duties. At the
conclusion of this assessment, the chief justice, in consultation
with the administrative director, shall determine whether the
judge will remain on the pro tempore appointment list.
(d) Compensation. A former justice or judge is entitled
to receive compensation for pro tempore judicial service at the
rate of $650 per day for any day during which the justice or
judge served for four hours or more, and $325 per day for any
day during which the justice or judge served less than four
hours. The annual compensation for pro tempore service may
not exceed the difference between the former justice’s or
judge’s annual retirement pay and the current annual base
salary of a justice or judge of the court from which the justice
or judge retired. The supreme court may relax this limit when
necessary to cover an extended judicial vacancy or in other
extenuating circumstances. The former justice or judge is not
entitled to personal, annual, or sick leave benefits, or health
insurance coverage under the active employee plan, and
acceptance of a pro tempore appointment acts as a waiver of
any claim to these benefits. For an appointment of over 90
consecutive days, these leave benefits and eligibility for health
insurance coverage under the active employee plan (as
permitted under the statutes and regulations that govern
participation in that plan) may be granted at the discretion of
the administrative director with the concurrence of the chief
justice.
(e)
Additional Service Credit. A former justice or
judge who has not accrued the maximum service credit for
retirement benefits under AS 22.25.020 is entitled to receive
additional service credit for each day of pro tempore service
until the maximum is reached.
(f)
Private Arbitration and Mediation. If, after a
former judge has been accepted for inclusion in the pro
tempore appointment list, the judge acts as a private arbitrator
or mediator, the judge must comply with the following rules to
remain eligible for pro tempore appointment:
(1) The judge shall refrain from soliciting or
accepting employment as an arbitrator or mediator from a
lawyer or party who is currently appearing in a case in which
the judge is serving as a pro tempore judicial officer.
(2) The judge shall disqualify himself or herself from
serving as a pro tempore judge in a case if the judge has
previously served as an arbitrator or mediator, either in a
private capacity or as a settlement judge, in the same matter.
This disqualification may be waived under Canon 3F of the
Code of Judicial Conduct.
(3) The judge shall disqualify himself or herself from
serving as a pro tempore judge in a case if the judge is
currently serving or is scheduled to serve as an arbitrator or
mediator in a private capacity for a lawyer or party in the case.
This disqualification may be waived under Canon 3F of the
Code of Judicial Conduct.
(4) The judge shall disqualify himself or herself from
serving as a pro tempore judge in a case if the judge served as
an arbitrator or mediator in a private capacity for a lawyer in
that case or a party to that case within the two years prior to the
judge’s assignment to the case. This disqualification may be
waived under Canon 3F of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
(5) The judge shall refrain from accepting
employment as an arbitrator or mediator from a lawyer or party
who, within the preceding six months, has appeared in any
case in which the judge was participating personally and
substantially as a judge at the same time.
For purposes of these restrictions, a senior judge is not
“serving as a pro tempore judge” or “participating personally
and substantially as a judge” if the judge has been assigned to a
case solely for the purpose of serving as a settlement judge.
As used in this Rule, the term “settlement judge” means a
judicial officer who is assigned to a case solely for the purpose
of consulting with the parties and assisting them in trying to
resolve their dispute without a trial or other formal
adjudicative hearing.
History
(Adopted by SCO 412 effective July 1, 1980; amended by SCO 443 effective November 13, 1980; by SCO 597 effective July 19, 1984; by SCO 857 effective July 15, 1988; by SCO 1153 effective July 15, 1994; by SCO 1262 effective February 27, 1997; by SCO 1324 effective July 15, 1998; by SCO 1358 effective July 15, 1999; by SCO 1629 effective December 31, 2006; by SCO 1736 effective July 1, 2010; by SCO 1869 effective January 1, 2016; by SCO 1874 effective April 27, 2016; by SCO 1917 effective December 1, 2017; by SCO 1932 effective July 11, 2018; by SCO 1952 effective July 24, 2019; by SCO 2017 effective April 1, 2024; by SCO 2032 effective November 11, 2024; and by SCO 2050 effective July 22, 2026)
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
ddbde5d3eaf7ca823c8c5e3039c94737ab2db894227ec933612d0a3944bb0103
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.