AK · jury_instructions
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 28.35.182(a)
Failure To Stop At The Direction Of a Peace Officer - First Degree
, the defendant in this case, has been charged with the crime of Failure to Stop at the Direction of a Peace Officer in the First Degree.
To prove that the defendant committed this crime, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
(1) The defendant was the [driver] [operator] of a [vehicle] [motor vehicle] [aircraft] [watercraft];
(2) The defendant was requested or signaled to stop by a peace officer;
(3) The defendant knowingly failed to stop as soon as practical in a reasonably safe manner under the circumstances, after being requested or signaled to do so by a peace officer; and
[(4) At the time the defendant failed to stop, the defendant was committing the offense of [Reckless Driving] [Vehicle Theft in the First Degree] [Vehicle Theft in the Second Degree].]
[(4) As a result of the defendant’s operating or driving, [an accident occurred] [a person suffered serious physical injury].]
History
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions 28.35.182(a), dated Revised 2016. Prepared by the Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
dd1d4ea5ca01e4eb8d9dab8659f1832c20db8b5647f9967066a39d17e347b41e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.