AK · jury_instructions
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 11.71.040(a)(2)
Misconduct Involving a Controlled Substance - Fourth Degree - Manufacture/Delivery/Possession of Schedule VIA Controlled Substance
, the defendant in this case, has been charged with the crime of misconduct involving a controlled substance in the fourth degree.
To prove that the defendant committed this crime, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
(1) the defendant knowingly [manufactured] [delivered] one or more preparations, compounds, mixtures, or substances containing a schedule VIA controlled substance; and
(2) the one or more preparations, compounds, mixtures, or substances containing a schedule VIA controlled substance had an aggregate weight of one ounce or more.
OR
(1) the defendant possessed one or more preparations, compounds, mixtures, or substances of an aggregate weight of one ounce or more containing a schedule VIA controlled substance; and
(2) the defendant did so with the intent to manufacture or deliver the controlled substance.
History
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions 11.71.040(a)(2), dated Added 2011. Prepared by the Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
3ffe110dd24451f6318ebe112785be24eb08fbbd560656153abad7a1e9156526
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.