AK · jury_instructions
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 11.71.010(a)(3)&(b)
Misconduct Involving a Controlled Substance - First Degree - Continuing Criminal Enterprise
, the defendant in this case, has been charged with the crime of misconduct involving a controlled substance in the first degree.
To prove that the defendant committed this crime, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly engaged in a continuing criminal enterprise.
A person is engaged in a continuing criminal enterprise when
(1) the person commits [first-] [second-] [third-] [fourth-]degree misconduct involving a controlled substance, as defined elsewhere in these instructions;
(2) the commission of that offense was part of a continuing series of five or more offenses amounting to misconduct involving a controlled substance in any degree, as defined elsewhere in these instructions;
(3) the defendant undertook the continuing series of five or more offenses with five or more other persons organized, supervised, or otherwise managed by the defendant; and
(4) the defendant obtained substantial income or resources from the continuing series of five or more offenses.
History
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions 11.71.010(a)(3)&(b), dated Added 2009. Prepared by the Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
0de4371bf625280f1ae85b42472f5cb62a57164bf29bd6efd4410866540c7bd0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.