AK · jury_instructions
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 11.61.200(a)(1)
Misconduct Involving Weapons - Third Degree
, the defendant in this case, has been charged with the crime of misconduct involving weapons in the third degree.
To prove that the defendant committed this crime, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
(1) the defendant knowingly possessed a firearm capable of being concealed on one’s person;
(2) the defendant had been [convicted of a felony] [adjudicated a delinquent minor for conduct that would constitute a felony if committed by an adult] by a court of this state, a court of the United States, or a court of another state or territory, and
(3) the defendant was aware of or recklessly disregarded the fact that he had been [convicted of a felony] [adjudicated a delinquent minor for conduct that would constitute a felony if committed by an adult] by a court of this state, a court of the United States, or a court of another state or territory.
History
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions 11.61.200(a)(1), dated Added 2009. Prepared by the Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
ef0f2c72db9fee0d2e0feb3b34a8a2dcd29ae0de96803f728b09e14f5b4d6319
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.