AK · jury_instructions
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 11.46.200(a)(2)#3
Theft of Services by Diversion - Second Degree
, the defendant in this case, has been charged with the crime of theft of services by diversion.
To prove that the defendant committed this crime, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
(1) the defendant had control over the disposition of services of others to which the defendant was not entitled;
(2) the defendant knowingly diverted those services to the defendant's own benefit or to the benefit of another not entitled to them;
(3) the defendant knew the defendant had no authority to divert the services in that way; [and]
[(4) the value of the services was $750 or more.]
[(4) the value of the services was $250 or more; and
(5) within the preceding five years, the defendant has been convicted and sentenced for theft or concealment of merchandise on two or more separate occasions in this or another jurisdiction.]
History
Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions 11.46.200(a)(2)#3, dated Revised 2015; list of updates: December 2015. Prepared by the Alaska Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
2fbe1ac1e00ab8830197f80dee17ab1703d2c71bf2a94a7e56fec95e43a49023
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.