AK · jury_instructions
Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instruction 8.09
Health Care Provider Malpractice – Recklessness Defined
The Plaintiff also claims the Defendant was reckless. I will now define recklessness for you. Recklessness by a health care provider means unreasonably disregarding an easily perceptible danger of death or substantial physical harm to a patient. A health care provider [facility] is reckless when [he/she/it] knows or has reason to know of facts that create a high degree of risk of serious physical harm to the patient [but deliberately acts or fails to act, disregarding that risk or acting with indifference to it] [but does not realize or appreciate the high degree of risk involved, although a reasonable health care provider [facility] in [his/her/its] position would]. Recklessness requires an unreasonable disregard of a risk of harm substantially in excess of that necessary to make the conduct negligent.
Recklessness is more than mere inadvertence, incompetence, unskillfulness, or a failure to take precautions to enable the actor to adequately cope with a possible or probable future emergency.
History
Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions 8.09, dated (Added 2026). Prepared by the Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
82a8661d6677b329f0e487dbeb786fb838d75fcaa444ffbdd556e80b8d8e0acc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.