Bindinglaw

AK · jury_instructions

Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instruction 8.09

Health Care Provider Malpractice – Recklessness Defined

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentas-observed

The Plaintiff also claims the Defendant was reckless. I will now define recklessness for you. Recklessness by a health care provider means unreasonably disregarding an easily perceptible danger of death or substantial physical harm to a patient. A health care provider [facility] is reckless when [he/she/it] knows or has reason to know of facts that create a high degree of risk of serious physical harm to the patient [but deliberately acts or fails to act, disregarding that risk or acting with indifference to it] [but does not realize or appreciate the high degree of risk involved, although a reasonable health care provider [facility] in [his/her/its] position would]. Recklessness requires an unreasonable disregard of a risk of harm substantially in excess of that necessary to make the conduct negligent.

Recklessness is more than mere inadvertence, incompetence, unskillfulness, or a failure to take precautions to enable the actor to adequately cope with a possible or probable future emergency.

History

Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions 8.09, dated (Added 2026). Prepared by the Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."

Provenance

Source
courts.alaska.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
82a8661d6677b329f0e487dbeb786fb838d75fcaa444ffbdd556e80b8d8e0acc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.