AK · jury_instructions
Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instruction 1A.20
Credibility of Witnesses - Witness Who Testifies Using American Sign Language
In this case, one of the witnesses will present [his] [her] testimony using American Sign Language through an interpreter. American Sign Language uses facial expressions and body movement in combination with hand signs to convey information. These facial expressions and body movements have specific meanings in American Sign Language which can be different that what you would ordinarily assume if you saw them used by an English speaker. In addition, when describing past events, people who use American Sign Language act out the situation, showing the actions and emotions of each person involved. This can be misunderstood as the person testifying being unnecessarily emotional or out of control. You should bear this information in mind when evaluating this testimony. Regardless of your familiarity with American Sign Language, you should avoid personally attempting to interpret the signs of a deaf person or an interpreter, as your guess about what is intended to be communicated by a sign, gesture, or facial expression may be inaccurate.
History
Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions 1A.20, dated Added 1999. Prepared by the Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
1a2f38698dd266baef2f0530ce0df0fcda5bab85b57fd38f8b5ada333bf979f8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.