AK · jury_instructions
Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instruction 19.03
Intentional Interference with Contract or Prospective Economic Advantage - Justification and Privilege
The plaintiff claims that the defendant’s conduct was not privileged or justified.
In order for the plaintiff to prevail, you must decide that one of the following statements is more likely true than not true:
(1) the defendant’s conduct was primarily motivated by something other than [protection of [his][her][its] economic interests] [safety concerns]; or
(2) the defendant used improper means to achieve [his][her][its] objective.
History
Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions 19.03, dated Revised 2012. Prepared by the Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."
Provenance
- Source
- courts.alaska.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
469624b3c50e840232d4d0c211c82f2f123a00cbf758f9bcae20cdc57aa0eeeb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.