AK · jury_instructions

Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instruction 17.06

Nondisclosure

activein force · 2010-01-01 – presentas-observed

The plaintiff alleges that [he][she] was harmed because the defendant failed to disclose information related to a transaction. To win on this claim, the plaintiff must prove it is more likely true than not true that:

(1) the defendant had a duty to disclose information to the plaintiff regarding the transaction;

(2) the defendant failed to take reasonable steps to disclose this information to the plaintiff;

(3) the information was known to the defendant before the transaction was completed;

(4) the defendant knew that the information could affect the plaintiff’s decision about the transaction;

(5) the plaintiff justifiably relied on an understanding of the transaction that was based on the absence of the information;

(6) the plaintiff suffered a monetary loss; and

(7) the defendant’s failure to disclose the information was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s loss.

History

Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions 17.06, dated 2010. Prepared by the Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."

Provenance

Source: courts.alaska.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-24
Edition: 2026-09-24
Content hash: a410d73074a02d60001f7f0bfa42a12ca98e37993ff698014e693eb201879796

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs