Bindinglaw

AK · jury_instructions

Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instruction 13.04

Abuse of Privilege

activein force · 1996-01-01 – presentas-observed

The plaintiff claims that the defendant exceeded [his] [her] [its] privilege to enter the plaintiff's property.

To determine whether the defendant exceeded the privilege, you must decide whether it is more likely true than not true that [the defendant intentionally performed an act that a reasonable person would regard as unnecessary to the exercise of the privilege. A person intentionally performs an act if the person acts with the desire to achieve that result or if the person believes that result is substantially certain to follow from his or her conduct.]

[(1) the defendant negligently exercised the privilege;

(2) the negligence was a legal cause of the plaintiff's harm; and

(3) the plaintiff was actually harmed.

I will define negligence and legal cause for you in a moment.]

If you decide that [this is] [all three of these things are] more likely true than not true, you must decide for the plaintiff on this claim. Otherwise, you must decide for the defendant.

History

Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions 13.04, dated Revised 1996. Prepared by the Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instructions Committee; published by the Alaska Court System. The Alaska Court System states that these instructions "have not been approved or promulgated by any court or the Alaska Bar Association."

Provenance

Source
courts.alaska.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
015494ba1c7a93d7b3191f632eb3196e9504b563d56f220eac15f735f11c9ddc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Alaska Civil Pattern Jury Instruction 13.04 · binding.law